Answer questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Answer questions - Essay Example The narrative incorporates different individual accounts of people who have attempted to battle business as usual in an offer to change the wellbeing area (Susan and Mathew, 2012). Question One: Importance of Preventive Medicine in Family Care Preventive medication is at the center of the narrative. One of the goals of the narrative is to support counteraction as opposed to relieving ailments. The ebb and flow medicinal services framework is centered around rewarding maladies as opposed to on discovering preventive arrangements. This has brought about Americans spending a great deal on social insurance yet the condition is by all accounts intensifying as of late. The narrative uncovers that the social insurance costs in America are quickly expanding advertisement could arrive at a yearly figure of about 4.2 trillions, which is about 20% of the country’s GDP (Gross Domestic Product) in ten years’ time (Susan and Mathew, 2012). The film further uncovers that the country s pends up as much as of 300 billion dollars on pharmaceutical medications and about 75% of the absolute social insurance costs are spent on preventable sicknesses (Susan and Mathew, 2012). These preventable illnesses can likewise be ascribed to the rising instances of incapacity among Americans. The best significance of preventive medication in family care as indicated by the narrative would be a decrease in social insurance costs (Susan and Mathew, 2012). Americans would need to spend less on treatment and their ways of life would be improved a lot. The nation will have the option to set aside a great deal of cash to put resources into different segments of the economy. This will likewise advance solid living among individuals thus staying away from preventable illnesses. Question Two: Main Issues the Film Raises with Current Healthcare System The narrative brings a significant number of the issues influencing medicinal services division to the bleeding edge. It raises issues influe ncing specialist organizations in all parts including essential consideration and family care among others. The narrative depicts the present medicinal services segment as broken as in it is benefit driven instead of patient driven, and concentrated on handy solutions as opposed to advancing avoidance (Susan and Mathew, 2012). The present human services framework is depicted as being massively lavish with numerous superfluous costs going in to medical issues that can be forestalled. The film likewise expresses that the present wellbeing framework has neglected to understand any unmistakable outcomes since the medical problems have diligently been influencing Americans with more individuals being incapacitated and increasingly other experiencing weight issues because of preventable causes. Question Three: Ways in Which an Existing Practice May Undermine Patient Outcomes Patient results might be sabotaged from numerous points of view in the present wellbeing framework. The greater par t of the specialist co-ops are benefit focused rather than showing restraint focused. They would prefer to offer patients transient arrangements with the goal that the patients spend more on treatment at the administration provider’s advantage. Question Four: New Approaches for Improving Patient Outcomes The narrative advances two fundamental methodologies that can viably change the whole wellbeing framework and improve tolerant results. These are putting more spotlight on high-contact and deterrent methodologies. A methodology depending more on high touch will guarantee a great deal of consideration is given to the patient and the administration they get through a more up close and personal methodology that guarantees there is a comprehension between the patients